Yep, I dumped Framer entirely because of their decision to stop supporting classic. Was really disappointed they went that route.

::praisehandsemoji::

Does this mean complete abandonment of CoffeeScript? It took me a long time to learn CoffeeScript as a nontechnical person. Coding hurts my brain. I'm not against life-long learning, but a switch to ES6 would be a giant kick in the nuts.

Exactly this.

I asked an enterprise relationship manager person from InVision a while back if they had tried to buy Sketch and he couldn’t keep a straight face. The only company with enough venture backing to attack the breadth of Adobe’s products is InVision. They have a solid platform and a large number of users. The only thing they’re missing is a primary design tool, which they know they need. That’s where Figma comes in. InVision already has a lot of collaboration tools, which Sketch lacks, so it would naturally extend InVision’s lineup.

Also, Sketch coming out with Libraries in the next release is a shot at Craft, which InVision has put a lot of effort in. Moves like that will motivate InVision to be less friendly to Sketch in the future.

I can see your point about smaller teams. I work on a team of about 50 designers and we're in the middle of a compete overhaul of our design system. Having a single source of truth for everything would be hugely beneficial.

Screen design tools, no; but prototyping tools, yes. I serve as my design team's internal support desk for all things related to Sketch and have been using it since 2012. Prototyping tools have been a source of frustration though. I was using Pixate for awhile till it was killed. I spend most of my time in InVision now, but I'm also trying to start integrating Framer more. Framer has taken the longest since Javascript/Coffescript has been admittedly difficult to learn.

Good points. I'll admit to some hyperbole.

And interesting comparisons to the programming side. I think it's fair to say that many developers are wrestling with the same issues. https://hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2016-d3a717dd577f

The Myers-Briggs test is junk science and should be treated as such. Neither Myers or Briggs had any psychology training.

"Research shows “that as many as three-quarters of test takers achieve a different personality type when tested again,” writes Annie Murphy Paul in The Cult of Personality Testing, “and the sixteen distinctive types described by the Myers-Briggs have no scientific basis whatsoever.” In a recent article, Roman Krznaric adds that “if you retake the test after only a five-week gap, there's around a 50% chance that you will fall into a different personality category.”"

https://www.vox.com/2014/7/15/5881947/myers-briggs-personality-test-meaningless

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-myers-briggs-personality-test-is-pretty-much-meaningless-9359770/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/give-and-take/201309/goodbye-mbti-the-fad-won-t-die

http://lifehacker.com/why-you-shouldnt-trust-the-myers-briggs-test-for-seriou-1697936838

https://www.recruiter.com/i/critique-of-the-myers-briggs-type-indicator-critique/

Since you apparently need your hand held to get behind simple paywalls for two out of the six articles I linked to, I'll do you a favor.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Trump%E2%80%99s+trade+policies+would+send+US+into+recession%2C+study+says&oq=Trump%E2%80%99s+trade+policies+would+send+US+into+recession%2C+study+says&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i61.269j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

https://www.google.com/search?q=Trump+Trade+Plan+Could+Push+U.S.+into+Recession%2C+Study+Says&oq=Trump+Trade+Plan+Could+Push+U.S.+into+Recession%2C+Study+Says&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.421j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

The unrestricted articles are the top result on both links.

If by talking points you mean widely accepted economic analysis then sure.

https://www.ft.com/content/e75a9a88-7e0c-11e6-8e50-8ec15fb462f4

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/trumps-trade-wall-will-make-americans-poorer

https://www.aei.org/publication/trump-again-on-trade-still-mostly-wrong/

http://thefederalist.com/2016/01/20/almost-everything-donald-trump-says-about-trade-with-china-is-wrong/

http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-trade-plan-could-push-u-s-into-recession-study-says-1474257662

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/10/trump-trade-plans-could-cause-global-recession-experts.html