Nope, these are two extreme cases and the truth is in the middle. You should hire a product or UI/UX professional who knows how to do beautiful and functional design.

Good and at the same time an alarming article. This may sound rough but if you have no aesthetics sense or if you are lazy and you need a tool to generate layouts, colors, typography for you, just change the profession. Typography is a pillar of (graphic) design. It's that simple.

Fu...n Dirbbble.

Just to clarify, this man has asked for help, which is good, so my comment doesn't apply to him.

Long live piracy, f.ck corporations!

Introducing an old website with a new penis friendly landing page.

I don't have anything specific, that's my personal opinion based on 15+ years of experience in this field. But you can check: https://openai.com/https://design.google/library/ai/https://algorithms.design/ (This is more about design in general) https://www.awwwards.com/AI-driven-designhttps://uxdesign.cc/how-ai-will-impact-your-routine-as-a-designer-2773a4b1728c etc.

Isn't that obvious? Every heard about Adaptive UX? Deep learning + 30 years of user behavior available as digital data for analysis (also as realtime infrastructure) = superior solutions that do not require hundreds of unprofitable UX Designers. The design will survive but more as an art discipline, however, that's another topic.

Cliché. Soon, AI will kill the UX profession and I kinda like that.

You can buy iMac 27 5K for $1,799.00 and use it as a Mac Pro display.

It depends on the intention of the creative process and the purpose of the thing created. But the line between art and design is blurry and cannot be defined objectively. - Well said.

Really? So, random photorealistic portrait or random brush stroke is art but an expressive typographic or illustrated poster is just an informational medium. The new generation of designers obviously does not know enough about the history of design.