Quickly wrote this up for ya:

javascript:(function(){var likes = parseInt(document.querySelector(".fav-number a").textContent.replace(",","").replace("likes","")); var views = parseInt(document.querySelector(".meta-views").textContent.replace(",","").replace("views",""));var percentage = ((likes / views) * 100).toFixed(2); var favDiv = document.querySelector(".fav-number a");var percentageSpan = document.createTextNode(" | " + percentage + "%");favDiv.appendChild(percentageSpan);}())

Just save that as a bookmarklet

and click it on a Dribbble post, and voila!

Cheers

The biggest issue in this is assuming people did not like it

I think it's kind of a potentially sad analytic for an otherwise fairly positive-feeling product. I'm also not sure what the percentage really tells you about your work, or the likes for that matter.

Low percentage : "It's interesting enough for people to view it, but not enough to select the like button."

High percentage : "So amazing that people absolutely could not resist selecting the like button."

I mean, why not go ahead and say, "94% bounce rate." I dunno.

I real problem with dribbble is it's a place for designers to pat each other on the backs, not a place for any constructive criticism. It's an ego farm.

Slight issue: Views = Logged in and logged out visitors. Likes = Logged in users only.

If you're assuming that the people who viewed, weren't logged in and didn't click LIKE didn't actually enjoy your post, you're going to have a bad time.

Sure, there's no way to quantify that on the other side either, but it's not smart to link views to likes in this case.

It shouldn't be too hard to make a Chrome Extension to do this. I'll try to whip one up in my free time.

I'd rather see a forced limit on the number of Likes you can give per month like they do with shots. If everyone has an unlimited number of likes, then each person's individual Likes are essentially only a shade above worthless.

Can we move onto fixing comments? Say if someone comments on a particular aesthetic issue - "thicker lines, man", we could rate the comments up/down, much like on here, perhaps suggesting % of dribbblers are in agreement with the critique.

I understand ratios.

It's all subjective; 100 views, 85 likes and 0 comments is less insightful than 1200 views 20 likes and 10 comments.

Design is subjective, only so much can be measured.

You would need to come up with an appropriate scale for what a good percentage is. For example, nobody would ever get a 100%. So what percentage would you consider good? 50%? 30%? I don't think its quite a clear as you might think.

Pass your 70-413 exam easily in first attempt by the help of latest Microsoft 70-413 real exam questions with valid answers. Braindumps4IT provide MCP 70-413 braindumps guaranteed success. We have updated 70-413 practice test questions and providing with Microsoft MCP exam passing assurance. https://www.braindumps4it.com/braindumps-70-413.html

This would work with a lot of websites, YouTube included!

maybe you should focus on doing good work instead of like counts and how popular you are compared to other people.

You should report this to Dribbble.

I'm just fucking too lazy to hit that like button, if i like something it goes in to my dragdis folder. I also forget to like things. Never really bothered paying attention to the likes. If a person takes the time to click on the preview in his feed to see the exact same thing but bigger i consider it as a like.

Already made it uses to measure it cut so I'll re: you know if this peace 0 to stream it creates really where try it shit know where you got to look at Ticket rate they come out it be honest more art is never perfect K so I'll I'm going to get the Patriot out right picture it XO but if I get it out just ate like a paper tell playing in for a to get it here pressed might put during K so hold on tight okay as housing just . http://www.testkiz.com/exam-70-413

Disagree. All this does is incentive designs that will net more 'likes'.

The focus should be less on 'likes' and more on original content.

Good idea, Tony. I'd definitely use this as an extension.

The like-to-view ratio, like most metrics, can be helpful if considered as one data point among many rather than the only measure of success.

Just saying that 'design is subjective' doesn't fully explain it. All design is evaluated in terms of audience and environment.

(1) Audience: Your design may be done for a particular aesthetic or to match a specific brand so may not garner as many likes from the average person. In particular, currently on Dribbble, shots that are animations and/or 'material' styled garner far more likes than others.

(2) Environment: Your design may be a piece among many that form a full product. Showing a single screen or shot doesn't always convey how it fits into the bigger picture. For example: some designs for smart watches look excellent on Dribbble but when in use and in harsh sun-light are hard to read or use.

As a corollary to (1): Would be neat to see a Like/View ratio from only your followers. The assumption being that your followers understand/appreciate your design aesthetic and therefore evaluate it differently. Again, this wouldn't be the single metric to rule them all but would be another useful data point.

People not hitting the like button =/= people did not like what they saw

number of views of a dribbble shot =/= number of dribbbler users who looked at the shot

That is actually pretty handy also it would require minimum effort to implement.