Designer News
Where the design community meets.
almost 10 years ago from Robin Raszka, www.pttrns.com
Probably, but for the future development and new features a static page isn't very versatile.
I've fallen into this same classic startup conundrum where I've justified over-complexity for future-proofing. If this project was architected in a way where you were cash positive every month 2k then I could see this rationale. There is a very slipper slope, one that I've fallen into many times.
I'm not sure what your future plans are, but at current state this could be static and cost you next to nothing to host.
One quick patch could be that you use a CDN to cache your assets. cloudflare.com is pretty good and very simple to use. The content isn't changing so you could set long TTL's which would reduce some load on your servers.
I actually think you could keep the code as it is and just cache it heavily. There are few personalized elements on the site, so caching would be very effective.
Yeah, that's a great point. Without seeing exactly what is costing so much, it would be hard to tell if that would completely alleviate the problems.
Designer News
Where the design community meets.
Designer News is a large, global community of people working or interested in design and technology.
Have feedback?
At the cost of $2k a month for that amount of views, it sounds like you need to hire a systems architect to refactor how the site is designed. The site could essentially be refactored to a static site running with a CDN. I would definitely look into optimizations of taking what is likely a bloated rails/node/ruby/java app and converting it to a static site with search powered by a third party search. You could probably cut your costs by 90% doing that.