↵

Twitter to remove 'like' tool in a bid to improve the quality of debate(telegraph.co.uk)

over 4 years ago from John Doe

  • Marc EdwardsMarc Edwards, over 4 years ago

    Their line is objectively wrong, and they are risking the future of their business as a result.

    1 point
    • Account deleted over 4 years ago

      Genuine question: Could you please explain how it is objectively wrong?

      0 points
      • Marc EdwardsMarc Edwards, over 4 years ago

        I could try, but I think this article does a better job than I could: https://extranewsfeed.com/tolerance-is-not-a-moral-precept-1af7007d6376

        1 point
        • Account deleted over 4 years ago

          That article contradicts your point.

          "To withdraw those protections from those who would destroy it does not violate its moral principles; it is fundamental to them, because without this enforcement, the treaty would collapse. It is appropriate, even ethical, to answer force with proportional force"

          That's what I'm saying - twitter's proportional force aligns with what they want to do, which is different from what you want to do, so by definition it isn't objective at all.

          -1 points